<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
     xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:ysrv="http://www.campusprogress.org">
  <channel>
    <title>Posts with the tag AEI</title>
    <link>http://www.campusprogress.org/page/community/tag_rss/AEI/html</link>
    <description></description>
                        <item>
            <title>Is Wal-Mart the Messiah?</title>
            <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The American Enterprise Institute has published yet another predictable piece of schlock entitled, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aei.org/books/bookID.867,filter.all/book_detail.asp&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Wal-Mart Revolution: How Big Box Stores Benefit Consumers, Workers, and the Economy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. It demonstrates that the only use these so-called conservative &amp;ldquo;think&amp;rdquo; tanks have for intellectual inquiry is the use of a couple ethically-challenged PhDs to lend credence to whatever strenuous distortions and selective interpretations of reality best serve their pathologically selfish, ultra-wealthy, anti-government donors. &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.nationalreview.com/review/?q=N2UyMmI3OWJkZGU2MDE1MjdmY2U0NDFkODMzMDJlY2U=&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;National Review Online&lt;/em&gt; interviewed&lt;/a&gt; one of the authors, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_Vedder&quot;&gt;Richard Vedder&lt;/a&gt; (who has contributed to such illustrious projects as tobacco industry junk-science, similar to his also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heartland.org/FellowDetail.cfm?expertId=55&quot;&gt;ethically&lt;/a&gt;-&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartland_Institute&quot;&gt;compromised &lt;/a&gt;co-author Wendell Cox).&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style=&quot;text-indent: 0.5in&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Vedder goes beyond defending the corporation &amp;ndash; with his effusive, gushing praise, he clearly likens the advent of Wal-Mart to something on par with the second coming. &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/07/why-we-did-it/&quot;&gt;Though Wal-Mart has joined the Center for American Progress in a coalition advocating universal healthcare&lt;/a&gt;, this coincidence of interests in no way absolves the corporation of its other questionable practices, and certainly doesn&amp;rsquo;t prevent us from being critical of it.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style=&quot;text-indent: 0.5in&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Vedder begins by claiming that by lowering the cost of goods &amp;ldquo;Wal-Mart has done more to help poor people than probably any bloated government bureaucracy or any other private institution.&amp;rdquo; Of course, enabling people to consume more goods for cheaper improves their welfare in only the most narrowly economistic sense. It says nothing of the (nonexistent) prospects for upward mobility in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/itvs/storewars/stores3.html&quot;&gt;high-turnover, sub-living wage&lt;/a&gt; occupation.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style=&quot;text-indent: 0.5in&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Asked how the corporation is received overseas, Vedder actually uses the corporate slogan in defending its appeal! (&amp;ldquo;But I can&amp;rsquo;t see how &amp;lsquo;every day low prices&amp;rsquo; and greater consumer choice will resonate badly with European consumers&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo;). He says that the company pays generous salaries with ample benefits, by citing an average wage of over $10 that must include managers and/or executives, since the average store worker takes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/itvs/storewars/stores3.html&quot;&gt;less than $250 home each week&lt;/a&gt; and makes a below-industry-average $7.50 an hour. He claims the workplace being union-free is because, like most of the labor market, its happy workers have resisted unionization, when the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040628/featherstone&quot;&gt;company&amp;rsquo;s anti-union stance&lt;/a&gt; has caused complaints of worker intimidation, misinformation, and led to complaints being filed with the National Labor Relations Board.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
            <link>http://www.campusprogress.org/page/community/post/niralshah/C3Tn</link>
            <comments>http://www.campusprogress.org/page/community/post/niralshah/C3Tn/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:35:26 EST</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.campusprogress.org/page/community/post/niralshah/C3Tn</guid>
            <dc:creator>niralshah</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>niralshah</db:author_name>
                <db:school>Dartmouth College</db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>4</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.campusprogress.org/page/community/comment_rss/C3Tn/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
      </channel>
</rss>